CHIEF CRITICS
Critics have argued that the OBBBA disproportionately benefits wealthy people by implementing individual tax cuts and offsetting the cut to revenue with reductions to Medicaid, nutrition assistance and clean-energy incentives. Economists and policy organizations argued the bill would increase income inequality because higher-income households received the largest tax benefits, while lower-income households were forced to bear the impact of the spending cuts. All Democrats in Congress vehemently opposed the bill and three Senate Republicans—Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina—voted against it. Collins and Tillis broke ranks primarily over concerns that the legislation’s Medicaid cuts would harm their constituents, while Paul was critical of its massive impact on the national debt.
Read more A Chinese Spacecraft Just Arrived At Earth’s ‘Quasi Moon’
CONTRA
Supporters argued the act would prevent large tax increases and provide financial certainty to families and businesses. They also said the bill would spur economic growth and encourage investment and manufacturing. They defended Medicaid cuts and reform by claiming they’d reduce waste, fraud and abuse of the program.
Read more Trump’s State Fair Shuts Down Temporarily As Extreme Heat Derails July 4th Events
Key background
The bill signed last Fourth of July, which contains hundreds of provisions, is the backbone of Trump’s domestic spending agenda. It raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion and is estimated to increase the budget deficit by $2.8 trillion by 2034. The bill passed Congress by a 51-50 vote in the Senate (Vice President JD Vance had to break a 50-50 tie) and a 218-214 vote in the House of Representatives despite universal Democratic opposition in both chambers.
Read more Trump Says He Doesn’t Read For Fun: ‘Usually Read Stories About Myself’