Crucial Quote
“The repeated assassination attempts and plots against President Trump and those around him demonstrate the National Security imperative for a bullet proof, drone proof Ballroom to protect the President, all future Presidents, their Cabinets, staffs, families, and guests,” DOJ attorney Brett A. Shumate wrote in the government’s letter to the court Tuesday.
Read more Allbirds Changes Name To Smartbird—Stock Skyrockets Again After AI Pivot
What to Watch for
It’s unclear when the federal appeals court could rule on the fate of Trump’s ballroom, but construction on the structure has been allowed to move forward while the judges deliberate. If the courts ultimately approve the project, Trump said in May he thinks the ballroom would likely open in the fall of 2028.
Big Number
$600 million. That’s how much the ballroom is now anticipated to cost, according to internal contractor estimates reported Tuesday by The Washington Post—far larger than the initial $200 million price tag initially announced for the project, which then went up to $400 million. While Trump originally promised the ballroom would be paid for through private donations, the Post reports internal communications show taxpayers are actually paying for slightly more than half of the ballroom’s total cost, largely through the Secret Service and White House Military Office. Trump has more recently claimed government funding will only be used to cover parts of the building that are dedicated to security functions, while the actual ballroom will only be privately funded. Experts cited by the Post suggested that’s not really possible, given it’s all one structure, and it’s “inevitable” that parts of the ballroom will end up being publicly funded.
Key Background
Trump’s planned 90,000 square foot ballroom, first announced last summer, has become a major source of controversy for the president, with an April poll finding 56% of Americans oppose the construction project. The lawsuit opposing the structure was brought by the nonprofit National Trust for Historic Preservation, which argues the executive branch does not have authority to construct the new ballroom without congressional approval, and that the ballroom and destruction of the previous East Wing harms people who enjoy the White House’s grounds and appreciate its history. The Trump administration has fought the litigation, arguing construction is already too far along for the project to be stopped by the courts. Judge Richard Leon against the government in March, writing that while Trump is the “steward” of the White House, he is “not the owner,” and “no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have” to build the ballroom. The federal appeals court has allowed construction to continue in the meantime, though multiple judges expressed skepticism about the government’s position when they heard arguments in the case earlier in June.
Read more Ozempic Linked To Lower Risk Of Violence In New Study
Further Reading
Alleged UFC Plotters Were Angry About Epstein Files, Affidavit Says (Forbes)
Trump’s DOJ Argues They Could Tear Down The Statue Of Liberty Without Legal Repercussions (Forbes)
Trump Reignites White House Ballroom Push After Shooting At Correspondents’ Dinner (Forbes)
Read more SpaceX Shares Drop 6% In First Decline Since Historic IPO